Actionist Knowledge Graph
Three sprints · five Opus owners per sprint · coordinator convergence between sprints

Research in parallel. Converge with evidence.

This graph compresses the 15 moving parts into three sprints and makes the missing integration job explicit: CENA verifies and joins Sprint 1 before any dependent framework synthesis begins.
3bounded sprints
5parallel Opus owners per sprint
15permanent knowledge nodes
Research can run in parallelFramework/build consumes verified convergence
S1

Independent evidence harvest

Research the domains that do not require a finished cross-system contract. Five persistent Opus owners work in parallel.

Gate · Five verified evidence packets; no synthesis contracts promoted.
S1-L1 · OPUS OWNER

Client demand science

Client-intelligence and ProductSpec evidence packs joined to all 17 industries.

  • Commercial discovery/product-spec survey
  • OSS discovery/spec agents
  • Industry priors and first-principles question policy
S1-L2 · OPUS OWNER

Capability supply graph

Top-100 candidate shelf with top-10 dossiers, overlap graph and industry joins.

  • Repository capability decomposition
  • Composite-repo overlap matrix
  • User-provided SaaS/repository lists retained as a separate source lane
S1-L3 · OPUS OWNER

Experience science

Component taxonomy, preference-science report and shell/archetype option map.

  • 21st refresh/dedupe/gallery research
  • Choice modelling and stopping rules
  • ISSO, SISOCRM, Bykonz and competitor shell comparisons
S1-L4 · OPUS OWNER

Host foundation

Data, identity/settings/navigation and connector evidence packs.

  • Workload-based data study
  • Host absorption and donor chrome removal
  • Tenant-safe connector architecture
S1-L5 · OPUS OWNER

Editor, runtime and learning

Private/OSS editor census, runtime profiles and production-learning model.

  • Open Design and comparable editor census
  • Sandbox/release/rollback precedents
  • Evidence feedback and asset reranking
S1-GATE · CENA coordinator

Sprint 1 evidence convergence

Turn five independent lane returns into one verified architectural handoff. Research owners supply evidence; the coordinator reconciles it; an independent verifier attacks it; Shaan decides consequential trade-offs.

Status · waiting for five lane callbacks
5lane callbacks
12part packets
4handoff artifacts
5Sprint 2 edges
S1-L1

Client evidence, industry priors, question policy and candidate ProductSpec.

S1-L2

Capability shelf, top-10 dossiers, overlap graph and industry joins.

S1-L3

Component taxonomy, preference experiments and shell/archetype options.

S1-L4

Data ownership, host identity/settings/navigation and connector constraints.

S1-L5

Editor operations, runtime/release profiles and learning evidence.

Coordinator outputs

  • S1-CONVERGENCE.md — Readable synthesis of shared findings, contradictions, unknowns and architectural implications.
  • s1-contract-handoff.json — Machine-readable candidate inputs, outputs, invariants and unresolved fields for every moving part.
  • cross-lane-dependency-matrix.json — Exact evidence and contract dependencies between Sprint 1 findings and Sprint 2 owners.
  • s1-decision-gates.json — Resolved, provisional, contradictory, experiment-required, operator-required and deferred decisions.

research/workstreams/2026-08-27-sprint-1/convergence/

Promotion gate

All five lane callbacks exist, twelve part packets pass structural and claim verification, four convergence artifacts exist, contradictions are classified, and operator-required decisions are reviewed. Until then Sprint 2 remains blocked.

  • Coordinator verifies packet counts, source identities, hashes, evidence classes and links.
  • Claims are deduplicated and normalized without rewriting historical receipts.
  • Contradictions and missing evidence remain explicit; no majority-vote synthesis.
  • A fresh-context Opus verifier attempts to falsify promoted claims but owns no product decision.
  • Shaan reviews decisions that change product direction, scope or irreversible architecture.

Exact handoff into Sprint 2

Sprint 2 ownerConsumes verified partsProduces
S2-L1P03 · P09 · P10 · P14P04 repo-to-block framework
S2-L2P05 · P06P07 design harmonization contract
S2-L3P05 · P06 · P08 · P13Formal P08 shell and P13 bounded-editor contracts
S2-L4P01 · P02 · P03 · P05 · P06 · P08 · P09 · P10 · P11 · P13 · P14 · P15P12 deterministic composer and compatibility schema
S2-L5P09 · P10 · P11 · P14 · P15Formal runtime, qualification, release, rollback and learning contracts
S2

Framework and contract synthesis

Use Sprint 1 evidence to design the three missing cross-domain systems and formalize the experience/runtime contracts.

Gate · All 15 node contracts reconcile; solver dry-run returns no hidden dependency.
S2-L1 · OPUS OWNER

Repo-to-block framework

Source-shape protocol, normalization surgery map and three worked conversion traces.

  • Consumes P03, P09, P10 and P14
  • Service, transplant and package examples
  • Branding/onboarding/settings/token/update mechanics
S2-L2 · OPUS OWNER

Design harmonization

Token extraction/mapping contract and visual-coherence experiments.

  • Consumes P05 and P06 evidence
  • Tests three visually different donors
  • Produces semantic token and scoped bridge contracts
S2-L3 · OPUS OWNER

Shell and editing framework

Archetype/shell contract plus an upgrade-safe visual change model.

  • Formalizes Sprint 1 option research
  • 20/80 host/app pane and alternative shells
  • Replace/add/remove/theme/text edit taxonomy
S2-L4 · OPUS OWNER

Deterministic composer

Compatibility schema, solver, UNDERDETERMINED protocol and synthetic fixtures.

  • Consumes every Sprint 1 contract
  • Model receives feasible sets only
  • Measures glue budget and clarification needs
S2-L5 · OPUS OWNER

Runtime and learning contracts

Runtime profile, qualification, release, rollback and feedback contracts.

  • Joins package/module/service execution
  • Defines accepted-build and maintained-client metrics
  • Independent review of framework operability
S3

Convergence and pilot blueprint

Pressure-test the complete graph against one industry workflow and produce a build-ready, independently reviewed pilot packet.

Gate · One chosen pilot, complete contracts, falsifiable evals and no unresolved critical edge.
S3-L1 · OPUS OWNER

Pilot demand and workflow

Industry choice, client workflow, archetype and acceptance fixtures.

  • Scores all 17 industries
  • Requires an accessible client path
  • Keeps one generic dashboard as control only
S3-L2 · OPUS OWNER

Pilot supply pack

Exact service, block, components and visual bindings for the pilot.

  • Pins reuse shapes
  • Records normalization surgery
  • No substitute or padding when supply is weak
S3-L3 · OPUS OWNER

Pilot host pack

Data, identity, settings, connectors, runtime and rollback plan.

  • One owner per state resource
  • Tenant-safe external actions
  • Preview and production profiles
S3-L4 · OPUS OWNER

Pilot assembly and editor

Deterministic AssemblyPlan, bounded change model and complete eval sequence.

  • No open-ended codegen assumption
  • Compares custom build, direct generation and assembly
  • Measures tokens, repairs and glue size
S3-L5 · OPUS OWNER

Independent adversary

Cross-source verification, contradiction ledger and proceed/redesign/stop verdict.

  • Owns no design artifact
  • Attempts to falsify every promoted claim
  • Checks all 15 pages and source receipts

How every agent gets enough context

Agents receive a compact index and exact source routes—not 500 MB of raw files stuffed into one prompt.

Required context

  • AGENTS.md and CURRENT_STATE.md
  • knowledge/00-MASTER-SYNTHESIS.md
  • knowledge/02-ASSUMPTION-LEDGER.md
  • knowledge/03-EVIDENCE-MAP.md
  • 17-industry specifications and niche→atom→block join
  • The dedicated page and linked resources for every owned part

Required return packet

  • research-report.md — source-backed findings and synthesis
  • source-register.jsonl — every commercial, OSS and local source
  • top-companies.jsonl and top-repos.jsonl — explicit denominators and top-10 dossiers
  • innovation-register.jsonl — wide ideas, scores and retained top 10
  • first-principles.md — irreducible problem, assumptions, contradictions and design
  • decision-ledger.json — decisions, confidence, falsifiers and dependencies
  • lane-state.json — counts, hashes, blockers, verification and callback

Compute discipline

  • One persistent Opus owner per lane; workers never self-fan
  • Checkpoint after prior audit, commercial survey, OSS survey and first-principles synthesis
  • Exact non-overlapping write ownership by part ID
  • Compact callback; full evidence remains in artifacts
  • Coordinator convergence plus fresh-context verifier before Sprint 2

Location and promotion contract

Write location

research/workstreams/<part-id>-<slug>/runs/<run-id>/

Each lane may own multiple part directories, but no two live agents write the same part.

Promotion

CENA validates counts, links, source classes, contradictions and hashes, creates the four convergence artifacts, and only then unlocks Sprint 2. Historical evidence is never rewritten.