{
"schema_version": "actionist.lane-state.v1",
"part": "P01",
"lane": "S1-L1",
"agent": "ACTIONIST-S1-L1-DEMAND",
"run_id": "2026-08-27-sprint-1-fable",
"observed": "2026-08-27",
"status": "packet_complete_unpromoted",
"sprint_complete": false,
"promotion_status": "unpromoted",
"parent_goal_status": "active",
"model": {
"lane_owner": "fable-5-1m for checkpoints 1-3, continued on opus-5-1m from checkpoint 3 onward at operator direction",
"subagent_policy": "opus_only",
"subagents_dispatched": [
{
"name": "s1l1-com-a",
"model": "opus",
"scope": "P01 commercial survey",
"status": "complete_no_report",
"note": "files verified on disk; completion report requested and not returned before close"
},
{
"name": "s1l1-oss-b",
"model": "opus",
"scope": "P01 OSS survey",
"status": "complete"
},
{
"name": "s1l1-adversary",
"model": "opus",
"scope": "independent challenge",
"status": "dispatched_no_verdict_returned_before_close",
"note": "Independent challenge did not return before lane close. Both corrections applied to this packet (disjointness overreach; invasiveness-ladder axis conflation) came from the LANE OWNER's own audit, not from this agent. Claims 2/3/5 — no maintained permissive OSS interview engine, 1-of-55 stopping rules, evidence-attribution hygiene — are SELF-ASSESSED ONLY and have NOT been independently reviewed. Coordinator should treat them accordingly."
}
],
"policy_violations": 0
},
"counts": {
"commercial_surfaces": 55,
"oss_surfaces": 50,
"local_sources": 10,
"source_register_rows": 115,
"external_denominator": 105,
"fetch_verified_external": 30,
"search_only_external": 75,
"fetch_verified_pct": 29,
"top_companies": 10,
"top_repos": 10,
"innovation_hypotheses": 50,
"industry_priors": 17,
"decisions": 10,
"rejected_decisions": 4,
"duplicate_ids": 0,
"invalid_json_rows": 0
},
"segment_breakdown": {
"commercial": {
"intake": 26,
"conversation-intelligence": 8,
"enrichment": 8,
"ai-discovery": 7,
"guided-selling": 6
},
"oss": {
"introspection": 12,
"task-mining": 9,
"active-learning": 8,
"org-graph": 8,
"enrichment": 7,
"process-mining": 6
}
},
"checkpoints": [
{
"id": 1,
"name": "prior-evidence-audit",
"status": "complete",
"path": "research/workstreams/2026-08-27-sprint-1/lanes/S1-L1/checkpoints/cp1-prior-evidence-audit.md"
},
{
"id": 2,
"name": "commercial-survey",
"status": "complete",
"path": "research/workstreams/2026-08-27-sprint-1/lanes/S1-L1/checkpoints/cp2-commercial-survey.md"
},
{
"id": 3,
"name": "oss-local-estate-survey",
"status": "complete",
"path": "research/workstreams/2026-08-27-sprint-1/lanes/S1-L1/checkpoints/cp3-oss-local-estate-survey.md"
},
{
"id": 4,
"name": "first-principles-synthesis-and-verification",
"status": "complete",
"note": "first-principles.md + decision-ledger.json + post-write smoke + self-falsification correction"
}
],
"smoke": {
"verdict": "PASS",
"checks": [
"all 7 required packet files present and non-empty",
"all JSONL rows parse; 0 invalid",
"decision-ledger.json parses",
"0 duplicate IDs across registers",
"all top-N IDs resolve into source-register",
"top-N ranks contiguous 1..10",
"industry priors = 17 unique industries",
"writes confined to owned directories (git status verified)",
"post-correction revalidation: all files parse after ladder and disjointness corrections"
]
},
"self_falsification": {
"performed": true,
"findings": [
{
"claim": "invasiveness ladder ordering",
"result": "WEAKENED — inversion found by the lane's own audit",
"detail": "The ladder is monotonic in ongoing access granted, not in sensitivity of data exposed. A rung-1 HAR export (no standing access) carries live cookies, bearer tokens and customer records; rung-4 attention telemetry (installed agent) carries only window titles. Conflating the axes would under-protect the cheap-looking rungs.",
"correction": "Escalation now governed by two independent scores (access_persistence, content_sensitivity). Corrected in first-principles.md, research-report.md and decision-ledger.json (D-P01-02).",
"status": "corrected_and_recorded"
},
{
"claim": "no maintained permissive OSS structured-interview engine (claim 2)",
"result": "QUALIFIED — survives only with the 'LLM-driven' qualifier",
"detail": "Cross-segment audit found maintained, genuinely permissive questionnaire engines with real conditional logic outside the dialog segment: SurveyKing (MIT), xiaoju-survey (Apache-2.0), Formily, FormKit, uniforms, formio.js. Absent is an engine combining declarative question machinery WITH LLM-conducted adaptive interviewing.",
"correction": "Build-not-adopt now scoped to the adaptive half only; deterministic question-graph half has adoptable prior art. Corrected in research-report.md, decision-ledger.json (D-P01-03) and lane-synthesis.md.",
"status": "corrected_and_recorded"
},
{
"claim": "only 1 of 55 commercial surfaces publishes a stopping rule (claim 3)",
"result": "WEAKENED — definition-sensitive",
"detail": "1/55 is correct for EXPLICIT CONFIGURABLE NAMED TERMINAL STATES (Fin for Sales). A second pass counted 13/55 rows mentioning some termination-adjacent mechanism (qualification, completion, escalation, routing, coverage). The headline is true only under the strict definition.",
"correction": "Both figures now stated with their definitions in research-report.md; the 1/55 figure must never be quoted without its definition.",
"status": "corrected_and_recorded"
},
{
"claim": "CENA verification defect — addendum 2 not fully reconciled on disk",
"result": "CONFIRMED — external finding, not self-caught",
"detail": "P01 first-principles.md constraints table and checkpoints/cp2-commercial-survey.md line 34 still carried the unqualified '1 of 55 stopping rule' claim after report/state/ledger/synthesis were corrected.",
"correction": "first-principles.md constraint row now states 1/55 explicit configurable named terminal states vs 13/55 termination-adjacent. cp2 checkpoint retained unedited as a dated receipt with an explicit SUPERSEDED notice appended, per evidence-immutability rule.",
"status": "corrected_and_recorded"
}
]
},
"blockers": [
"Canonical ClientContext field set cannot be closed: depends on P02 minimum-spec (sufficiency) and P12 input contract (necessity), both unsettled in Sprint 1.",
"Rung-0 Actionist-account source blocked on the unknown Actionist data/auth contract (U in current research).",
"Scraping permission is a policy-owner decision, not a research finding; the lane can supply an auditable scrape log but not permission.",
"Per-rung, per-industry acceptance rates unmeasurable without engagements.",
"bupaR licence UNCONFIRMED (LICENSE file names no licence); must be read from DESCRIPTION before relied on as the permissive escape from pm4py AGPL.",
"Fetch-verified fraction is 29% of external rows; both commercial agents hit usage limits mid-sweep."
],
"unexecuted_falsifiers": [
"Precompute elimination measurement vs question-only control",
"Ladder acceptance rates per rung per industry",
"17 cold-start question packs A/B against a generic opener",
"Wants-vs-pain divergence rate across engagements"
],
"boundaries": {
"research_only": true,
"client_data_used": false,
"authenticated_vendor_access": false,
"repositories_cloned": 0,
"repositories_executed": 0,
"builds_or_deploys": 0,
"validated_demand_established": false,
"admitted_blocks": 0,
"implementation_authorized": false,
"files_written_outside_owned_dirs": 0,
"owned_dirs": [
"research/workstreams/p01-client-intelligence/runs/2026-08-27-sprint-1-fable/",
"research/workstreams/p02-outcome-product-spec/runs/2026-08-27-sprint-1-fable/",
"research/workstreams/2026-08-27-sprint-1/lanes/S1-L1/"
]
},
"callback": {
"target": "CENA",
"channel": "herdr",
"note": "Coordinator override received mid-run: final compact callback goes to CENA, not ACTIONIST-S1-L2-SUPPLY as the dispatch file states. Dispatch re-read to confirm the original target before applying the override.",
"status": "staged_and_queued_to_CENA_pane_w659e02f80e5bb1-1"
},
"hashes_sha256_prefix16_final": {
"research-report.md": "fb255c5059259454",
"first-principles.md": "3c465e0b56176ec9",
"decision-ledger.json": "a6f0820e7e8cf644",
"source-register.jsonl": "0b8ace2040838601",
"top-companies.jsonl": "d2568d3e2847fe73",
"top-repos.jsonl": "1215e62b83e4091c",
"innovation-register.jsonl": "ffcfb085117a0eff",
"industry-discovery-priors.jsonl": "32bd6726fdbcbee8",
"hash_note": "Final hashes after all self-falsification corrections and the CENA reconciliation fix (first-principles.md constraint row)."
},
"independent_review": {
"status": "not_completed",
"verdict_received": false,
"self_audit_substituted": true,
"self_audit_findings": 4,
"caveat": "Depth-contract item 8 PARTIALLY met. An Opus adversary was dispatched but returned no verdict despite three requests; it sent only idle pings. The lane owner then ran the challenge itself across four headline claims and found four real defects (disjointness overreach, ladder axis conflation, claim-2 over-breadth, claim-3 definition sensitivity), all corrected. This is self-review, not independent review; the coordinator should weight it accordingly."
}
}P01 · Demand · Rendered from source
lane state
Client intelligence and discovery